The quandary of physical justice is the most paradoxical aspect of the philosophy of justice. It has the power to eliminate true justice. Physical justice continuously claims victims and deems those who demand the establishment of their rights as barbaric oppressors. The concept of moral justice is consistently perceived as being guilty of committing crimes, even though its primary objective is to defend all men. The application of physical justice in this manner can cause the depreciation and deterioration of moral values within the system of justice and ultimately lead to the suppression of true sources. If the adoption of international conventions is pointless, then we should not even ratify them to begin with. This reflects our pursuit of moral justice which aims at uniting the moral attitudes of men alongside the brutal physical exploitation. The monopolised principles of physical justice within the structure of the systems of international human rights and criminal justice have promoted the imposition of immoral supremacy. Arguing about the autonomous systems of justice at the international level is insincere and promotes the supremacy of atrocities. We must then ask: how useful are these monopolised principles of physical justice to human civilisation? This is an indispensable argument wherein the domination of the law, human rights law, resolutions of the UN, and, particularly, moral justice rely on the arbitrary decisions of deep states, i.e., the hidden criminal intrigues of governments.